4 ms·
By definition it has to be any task otherwise it wouldn't be general. What tasks wouldn't an AGI be able to perform and still be an AGI?
by arkitaip 4y ago
By definition it has to be any task otherwise it wouldn't be general. What tasks wouldn't an AGI be able to perform and still be an AGI?
- dymk 4y agoReliably trick a humans into thinking it's a human. That's it.
- mod 4y agoI believe that's the Turing Test, not necessarily a definition (or requirement) for AGI.
- dymk 4y agoWhere’s AGI defined? I’ve only seen it used in the context of “can pass the Turing test”
- dinosaurdynasty 4y agoAGI isn't really explicitly defined (it wouldn't be a problem if it was) but it's essentially an artificial version of the "general" intelligence that humans have, aka we can do and learn many things we were not programmed or trained by evolution to do
- nomel 4y agoIt sounds like you may be demanding more from AGI that we do of humans. AGI is a mushy concept, not a hard requirement. "Any task" is definitely not required for a low functioning AGI, just as it's not a requirement for a low functioning human, who still easily fits the definition of an intelligent being.
- yeellow 4y agoFor each human being having GI there are many tasks that person won't be able to perform. For example proving math theorems, doing research in physics, writing a poem, etc. Specyfic AGI could have its limitations as well.