It seems like a mistake, but the sort of mistake that makes me even more wary of them. They seemed to phrase things to imply things were more insured than not.

It seems like a mistake, but the sort of mistake that makes me even more wary of them. They seemed to phrase things to imply things were more insured than not. It seemed like they tried their best to arrange the verbiage in a way where they could be technically correct while still giving the wrong impression. So if something went tits up, they could say, "No, what we said was this". And it seems like they messed that up. They crossed the line that they didn't want to cross. So I'm sure that it was a mistake. They didn't mean to say the thing. But they really, really, really wanted to imply that thing. So, yeah, sketchy as hell.