3 ms·
This just isn't true though. I worked at a relatively minor video streaming company and we overloaded and took down AWS CloudFront for an entire region. They re
by dmikalova 4y ago
This just isn't true though. I worked at a relatively minor video streaming company and we overloaded and took down AWS CloudFront for an entire region. They refused to work with us or increase capacity because the datacenter (one of the ones in APac) was already full. This was on top of already spreading the load across 3 regions. We only had a few million viewers.
We ended up switching to Fastly for CDN. There's something hidden here though that becomes a problem at Netflix size. We were willing to pay the cloud provider tax, and we didn't dig down into kernel level or storage optimizations because off the shelf was good enough. At Netflixes scale, that adds up to millions of extra server hours you have to pay for if you don't do the 5% optimizations outlined in the article.
- rakoo 4y agoYou still have the same constraints: only you can serve content. The solution I'm talking about is bittorrent. The more people watch your content, the less your servers bear load. That is using the internet to its best potential instead of reverting back to the centralized model of the big shopping mall and its individual users.
- Mindwipe 4y agoPlenty of people have tried to build a peer to peer streaming system. Amazing tried for years. They work like garbage in practice for mainstream users.