5 ms·
Hulu was never Netflix scale. YouTube is a better example.
by msh 4y ago
Hulu was never Netflix scale. YouTube is a better example.
- birdyrooster 4y agoNot even close. YouTube has orders of magnitude more content and vastly more users. Google Global Cache was the inspiration for Open Connect.
- jedberg 4y agoYoutube is very different than Netflix from a technical problem perspective. They serve free videos to anyone around the world that are uploaded by users. It's closer to a live streaming problem than pre-encoded video like Netflix. Having worked at Netflix I can say that the YouTube problem is much more complex.
- why_only_15 4y agoI wonder what portion of Youtube's request traffic can be served with cache servers at the edge with a few hundred terabytes of storage. There's a very long tail but i would guess a significant portion of their traffic is the top ~10,000 videos at any given moment.
- spockz 4y agoThere was a Google organised hackathon on this topic. Given a set of resources, locations, and (estimated) popularity, Optimise for video load time by determining what should be moved to the cache when and where.
- skyde 4y agodid anything from the hackathon turn out to be used?
- spockz 4y agoI’m not sure as I don’t work at Google and didn’t see any follow up. Maybe some in the winning teams would know. I do think there is some temporal logic already present in Google’s algorithm which wasn’t part of the challenge.