3 ms·
> The defendant should get a retrial at least. You do not seem to grasp the implications of exculpatory evidence being destroyed. A retrial would be a vindicat
by puffoflogic 4y ago
> The defendant should get a retrial at least.
You do not seem to grasp the implications of exculpatory evidence being destroyed. A retrial would be a vindication of the corrupt prosecution - er, I mean, the corrupt law enforcement who was totally not an agent of the prosecution.