4 ms·
Some pigs are more important than other pigs. https://www.businessinsider.com/how-hillary-clinton-aide-destroyed-phones-2016-9?op=1 https://www.businessinsider
by tomohawk 4y ago
Some pigs are more important than other pigs.
https://www.businessinsider.com/how-hillary-clinton-aide-destroyed-phones-2016-9?op=1 https://www.businessinsider.com/how-hillary-clinton-aide-des...
EDIT:
Apparently a lot of people think the FBI is completely above board when dealing with more important pigs.
https://thefederalist.com/2022/08/19/think-the-fbi-deserves-the-benefit-of-the-doubt-this-laundry-list-of-corruption-should-make-you-think-again/ https://thefederalist.com/2022/08/19/think-the-fbi-deserves-...
- shadowgovt 4y agoNone of Clinton's phones were under subpoena as evidence in a case. In fact, destroying a device that may have held state secrets is good opsec. Edit: zdragnar is correct that the phones should probably have fallen under Federal Records Act handling.
- gfodor 4y agoPut the shoe on the other foot and imagine a political leader who you detest having this done, if you want to try to find the line between "plausible opsec" and "plausible criminality."
- balentio 4y agoNot being under subpoena is not to suggest that destroying these devices was motivated by a pure heart towards opsec security for the US.
- zdragnar 4y agoThe Federal Records Act disagrees. Everything should have been turned over to the responsible departments for record keeping, and letting them decide what should be destroyed and what should be preserved.
- Karampi1996 4y ago