> You completely omit (conveniently) how browsers have evolved over the past decade Why would I talk about that? The article is about the James Webb Space Tel

> You completely omit (conveniently) how browsers have evolved over the past decade Why would I talk about that? The article is about the James Webb Space Telescope, not the James Webb Browser. Aside from that, this is rooted at the mention of "node_modules", which is a NodeJS-ism; browsers don't even run NodeJS modules (unless you recompile them to standard JS), so browsers are doubly irrelevant... > and how npm itself (you could argue the entire JS ecosystem, along with language changes) has changed I didn't omit that. I was very explicit about NodeJS cannibalizing JS. > So frustrating to have conversations with those who have no perspective or context on the why and rest on their laurels of old when "things were easier". You seem to have me confused with someone else. (Talk about "context"!) Where does that quote from? It looks like you made it up.