3 ms·
> likely because they wouldn't have a way to reference it? Just add a version onto it, like RFC 1234-2022 for the version of RFC 1234 released in 2022 (or use
by thayne 4y ago
> likely because they wouldn't have a way to reference it?
Just add a version onto it, like RFC 1234-2022 for the version of RFC 1234 released in 2022 (or use incementing integers it doesn't really matter).
That's basically how language standards like ISO c and c++ and ecmascript are done isn't it?
- kcexn 4y agoThey often do have version and revision numbers. As well as final release numbers. I find the biggest issue is the lack of ability to trace the document forwards in the repositories. Usually an update will list which documents it updates but often it's much harder to find if there have been any new updates that have further obsoleted this update.