3 ms·
What are you talking about the most controversy is that scientist are refusing to answer questions sceptics have. Your talking points are just well poison used
by frypto 4y ago
What are you talking about the most controversy is that scientist are refusing to answer questions sceptics have. Your talking points are just well poison used to make critiques look stupid. Like what is the margin of error of the climate data. They don't give any and just say they don't need too, they are perfect. Which can easily be disproven.
Even Bill Gates criticized that scientist don't have an answer to "cloud formations" in his TED Talk about climate change. Clouds just don't exist in climate models, because apparently it's just to complicated.
- hotpotamus 4y agoIf you want metaphysical certitude, ask your preferred religious leader and then ignore all the other religious leaders who provide metaphysical certitude that contradicts your preferred religious leader. A good scientist will not provide you with guarantees, because they know that they are limited, imperfect humans who are doing the best with the information and models they have. Many people will interpret this as refusing to answer questions. The fact that we don't have a perfect understanding of climate does not suggest to me that we're free to alter the gas composition of our atmosphere any way we choose - I'd think the opposite - we should be careful when making changes to the Earth when we do not fully understand the consequences.