3 ms·
I mean, I don't really buy this "they were all as bad as each other" argument. We're not talking about some moral assessment of the totality of German and Briti
by JetSetWilly 4y ago
I mean, I don't really buy this "they were all as bad as each other" argument. We're not talking about some moral assessment of the totality of German and British civilisations, but rather more specifically about WWI itself and the lead up to it. The simple fact is that Germany initiated the war (turned a "cold" rivalry hot), it invaded its neighbour, it treated civilians abonimably, and Britain's involvement in the war was in practice defensive to its ally France and took place mostly on French territory. I don't recall Britain rounding up villages of Germans and executing them.
Even when it comes to the "war crimes" stuff in this thread - something like poison gases were straightforwardly outlawed by the Hague Convention, it was Germany that first decided to "go there" and make mass use of poison gas a feature of WWI.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hague_Conventions_of_1899_and_1907#Hague_Convention_of_1899 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hague_Conventions_of_1899_and_...
- bluGill 4y agoGermany was first, but both sides were looking for an excuse to start a war.
- throwaway_4ever 4y ago"Historian Joachim Remak[0] says: 'The nation that...can still be held least responsible for the outbreak of the war is France. This is so even if we bear in mind all the revisions of historical judgments, and all the revisions of these revisions, to which we have now been treated....The French, in 1914, entered the war because they had no alternative. The Germans had attacked them. History can be very simple at times.[1]'" [0]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joachim_Remak https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joachim_Remak [1]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_entry_into_World_War_I#France's_passive_role https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_entry_into_World_War_I#...