3 ms·
That's mostly just the case of a long-running system: It was a sensible choice in the day, and apparently it's held up, considering we're talking about an RFC r
by ocdtrekkie 4y ago
That's mostly just the case of a long-running system: It was a sensible choice in the day, and apparently it's held up, considering we're talking about an RFC revised 41 years later.
I do wish it was more clear how one could engage in the process: I will literally not sleep soundly at night until the HSTS standard is revised to remove it's malicious component (the "no user recourse" clause), but I also... really have no idea where to start on getting it amended.