4 ms·

Referring to your "[Citation Needed]" it was a quote from the paper referenced in the last paragraph which I cited in my original statement. The persecution co

Referring to your "[Citation Needed]" it was a quote from the paper referenced in the last paragraph which I cited in my original statement. The persecution complex you refer to is quoting the actual paper in the exact location I specified. Look man, I'm not sure where the hostility is coming from but you obviously have something you need to get off your chest. If you want to vent it here you can if you agree to not vent it on someone else later.

ddeeo 4y ago
My "[Citation Needed]" was for the original claim you seem to agree with, neither you nor the paper's author provide evidence for this claim or substantiate it. Hence I'm asking for a source. The author doesn't have one, do you? Not just clickbait articles either, but proper research that establishes not only that curriculum regarding sex differences has been altered on a large scale to exclude any mention of established sex differences, but that it was not caused by evolution of our understanding of the concept and the on-going debate surrounding it, but by a defined political force that could be constituted as a "movement." As it stands, the paper doesn't do that, so it's conclusions are just ramblings of no substance. Of course, as I said, I'm not getting said source, because no such thing exists and with your comment dodging the question as well, I was proven right. QED? Furthermore, neither you nor the author even elaborate on what this movement is, or what exactly is it doing. Hence my comment regarding persecution complexes. Imagining some vaguely defined "movement" that is allegedly doing a vaguely-defined something that is framed as disagreeable is exactly what a persecution complex is. Oh and nice try with the accusation of "hostility". I see you've learned a great deal from this paper when it comes to deflecting criticism.
cholantesh 4y ago
I hope Marco sees this, bro.

ddeeo 4y ago

My "[Citation Needed]" was for the original claim you seem to agree with, neither you nor the paper's author provide evidence for this claim or substantiate it. Hence I'm asking for a source. The author doesn't have one, do you? Not just clickbait articles either, but proper research that establishes not only that curriculum regarding sex differences has been altered on a large scale to exclude any mention of established sex differences, but that it was not caused by evolution of our understanding of the concept and the on-going debate surrounding it, but by a defined political force that could be constituted as a "movement." As it stands, the paper doesn't do that, so it's conclusions are just ramblings of no substance. Of course, as I said, I'm not getting said source, because no such thing exists and with your comment dodging the question as well, I was proven right. QED? Furthermore, neither you nor the author even elaborate on what this movement is, or what exactly is it doing. Hence my comment regarding persecution complexes. Imagining some vaguely defined "movement" that is allegedly doing a vaguely-defined something that is framed as disagreeable is exactly what a persecution complex is. Oh and nice try with the accusation of "hostility". I see you've learned a great deal from this paper when it comes to deflecting criticism.

cholantesh 4y ago

I hope Marco sees this, bro.