3 ms·
I think you're counting all casualties caused by Central Powers as a consequence of Germany's invasion of France. It can be seen like that but you should make
by dmichulke 4y ago
I think you're counting all casualties caused by Central Powers as a consequence of Germany's invasion of France.
It can be seen like that but you should make clear that it assumes German single responsibility for the war, including for her Allies' actions against civilians, and also indirect consequences such as deaths caused by malnutrition.
Then you would arrive at 3.78 million deaths, worst-case
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_I_casualties https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_I_casualties
- throwaway_4ever 4y agoYes, I do. Austria-Hungary only invaded Serbia because they had the support of Germany. Germany's invasion caused the civilian death tolls across the continent. No German and Austria-Hungarian invasions, likely no mass murder.
- dmichulke 4y agoI don't personally agree with any story where there's one single 100% responsible party, be it divorce, terrorism or war. But that doesn't mean that I'm right or that you're wrong...