37 ms·
It’s smaller-scale than automobility though, which is what people are used to. I agree it’s not perfect, but I think we need a better designator than “bike lane
by ryukafalz 4y ago
It’s smaller-scale than automobility though, which is what people are used to. I agree it’s not perfect, but I think we need a better designator than “bike lanes” for the type of infrastructure we’re aiming for. It can and should be used by more than just cyclists; cycle tracks can also be great for those using e.g. mobility scooters:
https://youtu.be/xSGx3HSjKDo https://youtu.be/xSGx3HSjKDo
In the Netherlands there are enough cyclists that it works, but here in the US I feel like the term “cyclist” is often used as a pejorative. Making the name more inclusive of varying modes I think might help to counter this.
- mcv 4y agoMaybe "light mobility"? I considered "smart mobility", but that has a bit too much of a value judgement in it (though I definitely agree with that judgement).
- ryukafalz 4y agoLight mobility sounds pretty good to me honestly. Though the term “micromobility” has caught on pretty well, so this may be a losing battle. :)