5 ms·
History is written by the victors. When you're on the overall winning side you can wipe out war crimes or genocide within a blink of a decade. Just as long as y
by buran77 4y ago
History is written by the victors. When you're on the overall winning side you can wipe out war crimes or genocide within a blink of a decade. Just as long as you can stay on that side until your past becomes distant enough.
Even provable facts don't really get traction and things get swept under the rug. You don't get to read that much about such a British blockade against Germany, about a Belgian genocide in Congo (or any other major European country, even for things from the past century), etc. It's not that they're not considered big deals, it's that people are usually completely unaware they even happened.
- cafard 4y agoHardly a thing about the Congo: https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/king-leopolds-ghost-adam-hochschild/1100487017?ean=9780358212508 https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/king-leopolds-ghost-adam-ho... (published 2020) https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/king-leopolds-soliloquy-mark-twain/1102636173?ean=9788187496557 https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/king-leopolds-soliloquy-mar... (edition of 2020, written by Mark Twain in 1905)
- buran77 4y agoAah! A book! But really, I tried to make my point very clear. It's not that there's no info out there. Sweeping something under the rug doesn't mean the dust stopped existing, just that it's not immediately apparent and most people won't notice it. Ask a random person to list if they heard of King Leopold, the Congo genocide, etc. and see how many have heard the names before, let alone understand what's behind. Sure there's a Wiki page with details but the magic of rewriting history is not in deleting the truth but in making it uninteresting and obscure. And that allows people the assumption that nothing like this could have ever happened.