2 ms·

I understood what you were saying; I was trying to answer your question. What I was saying was that the answer to your question of "why might the situation turn

I understood what you were saying; I was trying to answer your question. What I was saying was that the answer to your question of "why might the situation turn out any different with PFAS than plastics" is that one of them appears far more dangerous than the other. i.e. With PFAS the question for consumers is no longer "how do I (re?)use it efficiently" (as with plastics and recycling), but rather "how do I not use it at all".

chiefalchemist 4y ago
And ironically, the more dangerous one...most people - including elected officials and other regulators - know nothing about. Plastic isn't regulated because we have recycling. I fear PFASs - to your point, far more dangerous - will enjoy the same ignorance is bliss freedom.