4 ms·
I really like quantum flytrap. Happy to see you added a bunch of tools to do basic classical processing of the events, so I don't have to hack around that anymo
by Strilanc 4y ago
I really like quantum flytrap. Happy to see you added a bunch of tools to do basic classical processing of the events, so I don't have to hack around that anymore by like making the bombs conditionally transparent.
One feature request: the setups are small enough that you could fit a description of them into the URL. This would allow people to much more easily share setups on forums and twitter and etc. This is what I did in Quirk and it's been one of the more useful features https://algassert.com/quirk#circuit=%7B%22cols%22%3A%5B%5B%22H%22%5D%2C%5B%22%E2%80%A2%22%2C%22X%22%5D%2C%5B%22Chance2%22%5D%5D%7D https://algassert.com/quirk#circuit=%7B%22cols%22%3A%5B%5B%2...
- stared 4y agoAnd I do like Quirk (we mention it in the intro to our recent paper https://doi.org/10.1117/1.OE.61.8.081808 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.OE.61.8.081808). And in the (not yet released) interactive element description for CNOT (along with Quantum Odyssey). When it comes to links - a good point. I do like the StackOverflow style. I will discuss it with the team.