3 ms·
I don't want to read the times article, it's just going to be more accusations and conjecture without proof And even if I did, and decided I don't want to let
by istinetz 4y ago
I don't want to read the times article, it's just going to be more accusations and conjecture without proof
And even if I did, and decided I don't want to let my daughter near him based on the rumours, I would certainly not slander him in public based on rumours
- klabb3 4y agoThe problem is the bar for proof, like a guilty verdict, is so high in cases of massive power differentials, that it is almost unreachable. Look at Harvey. It was an open secret for decades. He used his connections, payoffs, shady private investigators to suppress his victims. Or like Dan Price put it himself: > “In the unlikely event that you are falsely accused, remember that it will be much easier for you to overcome false allegations than it will be for actual victims to overcome the trauma of harassment or assault.”
- JohnHaugeland 4y agoThis comment is conjecture Your refusal to learn what happened is not a firm of wisely handling doubt