2 ms·

Ask yourself, would you let your daughter/spouse/sister go on a date/business dinner alone with him after reading the times article?

yieldcrv 4y ago
social discretion has nothing to do with the legal system that being reiterated, thats a total nightmare for the guy in that couple to reinforce his girlfriend to see Dan, another man, and then needing to rescue her from peril, whether that’s just reckless driving that made her uncomfortable and putting her in danger or if thats includes a someone (Dan’s) hand on her neck and that crossing her boundaries and that relationship’s boundaries (I would say consensual or nonconsensual, but these are things I don't know with this dynamic, read below). Thats nightmarish when I think about people I love. I find it interesting that they both made a trip to Seattle from San Diego and the boyfriend was therefore available to rescue her by car, I am wondering if that context was made clear during this date with Dan. This doesnt excuse any nonconsensual thing, there are some aspects I find completely foreign.
istinetz 4y ago
I don't want to read the times article, it's just going to be more accusations and conjecture without proof And even if I did, and decided I don't want to let my daughter near him based on the rumours, I would certainly not slander him in public based on rumours
- klabb3 4y ago
  The problem is the bar for proof, like a guilty verdict, is so high in cases of massive power differentials, that it is almost unreachable. Look at Harvey. It was an open secret for decades. He used his connections, payoffs, shady private investigators to suppress his victims. Or like Dan Price put it himself: > “In the unlikely event that you are falsely accused, remember that it will be much easier for you to overcome false allegations than it will be for actual victims to overcome the trauma of harassment or assault.”
- JohnHaugeland 4y ago
  This comment is conjecture Your refusal to learn what happened is not a firm of wisely handling doubt

yieldcrv 4y ago

social discretion has nothing to do with the legal system that being reiterated, thats a total nightmare for the guy in that couple to reinforce his girlfriend to see Dan, another man, and then needing to rescue her from peril, whether that’s just reckless driving that made her uncomfortable and putting her in danger or if thats includes a someone (Dan’s) hand on her neck and that crossing her boundaries and that relationship’s boundaries (I would say consensual or nonconsensual, but these are things I don't know with this dynamic, read below). Thats nightmarish when I think about people I love. I find it interesting that they both made a trip to Seattle from San Diego and the boyfriend was therefore available to rescue her by car, I am wondering if that context was made clear during this date with Dan. This doesnt excuse any nonconsensual thing, there are some aspects I find completely foreign.

istinetz 4y ago

I don't want to read the times article, it's just going to be more accusations and conjecture without proof And even if I did, and decided I don't want to let my daughter near him based on the rumours, I would certainly not slander him in public based on rumours

klabb3 4y ago
The problem is the bar for proof, like a guilty verdict, is so high in cases of massive power differentials, that it is almost unreachable. Look at Harvey. It was an open secret for decades. He used his connections, payoffs, shady private investigators to suppress his victims. Or like Dan Price put it himself: > “In the unlikely event that you are falsely accused, remember that it will be much easier for you to overcome false allegations than it will be for actual victims to overcome the trauma of harassment or assault.”
JohnHaugeland 4y ago
This comment is conjecture Your refusal to learn what happened is not a firm of wisely handling doubt