3 ms·
My background is with LINQ, which means I find it more natural to group it as: st {for s in state} {for st in states[(s,letter)]} But I agree, reading it as E
by ajanuary 15y ago
My background is with LINQ, which means I find it more natural to group it as:
st {for s in state} {for st in states[(s,letter)]}
But I agree, reading it as English your grouping makes more sense.