> Years later, for many, Jordan’s brand is intrinsically tied to this choice. I really dislike this kind of journalism. How many is "many"? Is it just the auth

> Years later, for many, Jordan’s brand is intrinsically tied to this choice. I really dislike this kind of journalism. How many is "many"? Is it just the author and their circle? Is it just people who insist that everything is political? I think this is a lazy assertion, which is a shame because I enjoyed the content that followed it. Surely there's a better introduction available.