4 ms·
>Does this person have 200M to pay back? If not, put him back in jail The US doesn't have debtor's prisons. They should be in jail, but not because they can't
by xxpor 4y ago
>Does this person have 200M to pay back? If not, put him back in jail
The US doesn't have debtor's prisons.
They should be in jail, but not because they can't pay fines.
- ALittleLight 4y ago
- calvinmorrison 4y agoWell the US government jailed the kids, they should be paying out.
- eastbound 4y agoYes, as usual, everyone in the chain of hierarchy of the judge should be jailed. If they didn’t know, it was their job to.
- Ekaros 4y agoAnd if they were elected. I'm also all for throwing every voter in with the rest.
- calvinmorrison 4y agoDo moral culpability when it comes to our failings as a nation, precisely because we have a democracy? Or, do we even really have a choice? With the coercive system in place one can hardly not interact with the government. Throwing a name in a hat to elect your local jailer doesn't make you morally culpable when you are essentially forced to participate. Eg, jury duty. You are threatened to show up under threat of fines or jailing. How can you say a jury is unbiased when they've been forced under threat of death to appear?
- DiggyJohnson 4y agoYou’d throw the clerk’s intern in jail? Seriously?
- eastbound 4y agoNo, the bosses.
- quickthrowman 4y agoThese two were Luzerne County, PA judges, so the County or Pennsylvania jailed the kids, not the US federal government.
- calvinmorrison 4y agoWe can split hairs over federalism while kids rot in jail.