Well, honestly it was more about the absolute scale metric: when a little portion of global population (5-10%) consumed more than 70% of the resources globally

Well, honestly it was more about the absolute scale metric: when a little portion of global population (5-10%) consumed more than 70% of the resources globally and was responsible for more than half of the global pollution over the past 3 generations, how bad is it in absolutes scale? At least China represent 1/4 of global population and resemble a global government more than all western countries combined, including their power of influence over large scale events,like climate change. If they bail out from climate talks and zero emission plans over, say, interference on the Taiwan issue, is it bad or good? What is the best solution globally, pissing off China or human survival? It's something we should ask ourselves, I think.