3 ms·
It's not just nostalgia: - the buttons are big - there is high contrasts - sections are clearly delimited I have the current Thunderbird open all day, and I
by BiteCode_dev 4y ago
It's not just nostalgia:
- the buttons are big
- there is high contrasts
- sections are clearly delimited
I have the current Thunderbird open all day, and I'm constantly searching for things. It looks much better, much leaner and cleaner. But nothing stands out from the rest, everything is a shade of grey, buttons are flat, section are loosely separated or sometimes merged, labels don't have icons.
It's like the debate about cars with touch screen or buttons: the touch screen makes for a much better look, but its usability sucks.
It's not just thunderbird. Phone apps, web apps, they all follow trends that have nothing to do with usability. They copy each others in loop, bored designers go one more round (see ubuntu for an extreme example of this), A/B testing tells manager people downloaded your app more because of the pretty UI or screenshots on the short term.
But the current design is a usability disaster, and is only partially working because the UI are getting dumbed down more and more. Apps have less and less accessible buttons and menus. It makes you less productive, but it's easier for the average user, thanks to the paradox of choice. Because of this, having a lean UI is not as terrible, since you don't display much on the viewport anyway (e.g: youtube latest changes, or just tik tok). But of course, advanced users pay a price for that. Also, you can't do it for professional software unless you want to render it harder to use. Case in point: Thunderbird.
- wildrhythms 4y agoWe used to have artistic masterpieces for icons compared to the near incomprehensible "silhouette" style uninspired hieroglyphs we call icons today.
- thaumasiotes 4y agoTo me the 1.0 screenshot looks nearly identical to the Thunderbird window I have open right now. I don't have email-related buttons, since I have no email account configured. I use Thunderbird for RSS feeds. But the rest of the interface is exactly the same, except that the window topbar is tabbed in modern Thunderbird. As for Windows XP being the pinnacle of design, I always hated its default theme (visible in the screenshot of the setup window, though, oddly, not in the screenshot of the running app) and changed it to the Windows 95 theme on all of my computers. I still hate the XP look. EDIT: I was wrong; I do have the email-related buttons. I've just never noticed them. Instead of square icons, they are now text labels (with pointless icons next to the text in most cases). I don't really see that as a problem. Usually the problem in modern design is that the pointless icon is viewed as a substitute for the text.