3 ms·
If there's one thing that all the research being done suggests, it's that there is no one-size-fits-all approach to weight maintenance. "Just eat less", or "mo
by tallanvor 15y ago
If there's one thing that all the research being done suggests, it's that there is no one-size-fits-all approach to weight maintenance. "Just eat less", or "move more" are solutions suggested by many people, but it's not that simple.
Some bodies naturally store excess calories as fat, while in others the body ups its metabolism to try and prevent this. At the same time, diet certainly plays a role - some forms of carbs can be converted into body fat much more easily than other energy sources (the fat that you eat, for example, doesn't get converted into body fat nearly as efficiently as sugar, for example). And of course, once you've been fat, even if you lose the weight you will have to work harder to keep it off. --There was an NPR story about a study that if you have two people of similar weight and muscle mass, one of whom has lost a lot of weight, the person who lost the weight may have to eat as much as 500 fewer calories per day to maintain his or her weight. It's no wonder how few people manage to keep weight off.
Personally, I've been struggling with my weight since I was 9 years old. I used to be skinny, but I managed to catch hepatitis, and after that I started gaining weight. One of my doctors told me this wasn't that surprising as hepatitis can often cause drastic changes to your metabolism. At my heaviest I was around 290lb, but I'm down under 190, and have been as low as 175 - it's not easy, though. I try hard to watch what I eat (not always successfully, obviously). I used to do high intensity workouts of at least 1 hour 6 times a week - in 2010 I was at the gym more than 300 times. I suffered a setback earlier this year that accounted for a fair bit of the weight gain back from 175 to almost 190 when I caught mono and was advised by my doctor not to work out for 6 weeks, and lingering fatigue issues meant there were many weeks where I only managed to make it to the gym 2 or 3 times a week. I'm finally back up to 5 workouts a week near my old intensity, but it'll still take months of keeping this up to get my weight back down. I'd love to make it down to about 160-170, but that won't be easy.
- jacques_chester 15y agoHi, I'm one of the others who suggested "eat less". Is it "that simple"? No, of course not. The body is stupidly complex and variability between individuals is enormous. On the other hand, is it "that simple"? Yes, of course it is. Chemical reactions in human beings are much as anywhere else. What matters for weight loss purposes is that your internal mechanisms are, for the most part, not observable. I personally can tell when I fall into gluconeogenesis (the breakdown of amino acids into glucose) because I can smell the ammonia produced as a by-product. But otherwise I wasn't born with a dashboard with helpful graphs of my insulin sensitivity over the past 5 minutes, my current circulating grehlin, testosterone levels or any one of a hundred variables that will have some effect on what happens to me today. So what can I observe? I can observe: * My current weight on a scale * My current physical appearance * Some calliper fold measurements * Weight lifting performance * How much I am eating And so I use these to control my weight, strength, appearance and so on. Because that's what I have. As I said elsewhere, it's more important to find a dietary approach that works for you. Some people are good at counting calories (not me). Some find it surprisingly easy to give up carbs or fast or whatever. So long as you find an approach, that's what matters. I'm sorry to hear about your illness. How are you training? Are you on fitocracy?