> Market success would establish efficacy. In the meantime, patients will be switching from drugs with known efficacy to wonder drugs with potentially no clini

> Market success would establish efficacy. In the meantime, patients will be switching from drugs with known efficacy to wonder drugs with potentially no clinical evidence of having a medicinal effect. > Could there be ineffective drugs? Sure. But as doctors and patients learn, such drugs would disappear over time. Trying to do that piece meal won't work. You need controlled statistical studies to establish such things. > doctors must still evaluate the drug to find out how efficacious it is for each particular patient. Generally informed by subsequent clinical trials. They don't just go with their gut. > Btw Ivermectin is FDA approved. I am not sure why you bring that up? You know very well why. In fact it kind of makes my point. Patients are attempting to switch from a treatment regime with known efficacy (vaccines) to one with highly questionable efficacy (Ivermectin). If you follow through with your plans to deregulate the pharmaceuticals industry, you'll see a lot more of that.