3 ms·
Isn't that basically the same as commissioning some art from a digital artist? You could say it's fancy clip art too.
by prohobo 4y ago
Isn't that basically the same as commissioning some art from a digital artist? You could say it's fancy clip art too.
- oldstrangers 4y agoIf you equate the uniquely individualistic style of a human artist and the totality of the human condition that informed that artist's style with a machine cobbling together a collection of data points then uhhh, sure?
- krapp 4y agoNo human artist is uniquely individualistic. All human artists are informed by their education, environment, and the styles of their peers. Even in the "radicals" you can see influences, and a context in which their work fits. Also, no human has ever experienced, much less can be informed by, the "totality" of the human condition. Whatever that's even supposed to mean, besides the effect of a human being having "cobbled together a collection of data points" through life experience. You're trying very hard to frame creativity as transcendent in scope and almost supernatural in scope, as if art were a divine spark no machine could ever be capable of reproducing. But history is littered with examples to the contrary, and so far only examples to the contrary.