3 ms·
Chicken is less dangerous than pork. I am not going to get involved in a religious argument, but I didn't mention it was the only reason, I said it was one of
by kentrado 4y ago
Chicken is less dangerous than pork.
I am not going to get involved in a religious argument, but I didn't mention it was the only reason, I said it was one of the reasons.
- steve_adams_86 4y agoThis simply isn’t true. From a health as well as safety standpoint, chicken correlates with worth health outcomes and definitely leads to more illnesses.
- slothtrop 4y agoRelative to pork? Source.
- steve_adams_86 4y agohttps://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/67/ss/ss6710a1.htm https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/67/ss/ss6710a1.htm
- kentrado 4y agoThe salmonella you get from undercooked chicken is less dangerous than the parasites in under cooked pork.
- steve_adams_86 4y agoThe difference is that almost all chicken is contaminated while very little pork is. If we compare contaminated meat, okay, maybe pork is more dangerous. If we compare what people actually encounter, pork appears much less dangerous.