3 ms·

Considering posters below genuinely took it as in line with what they'd read in other threads and indeed did not even realize it was satire because that's speci

Considering posters below genuinely took it as in line with what they'd read in other threads and indeed did not even realize it was satire because that's specifically in line what stereotypical commenters were saying, I'm just going to say you're full of shit. Otherwise maybe you should direct your unpleasantness their way, since they're so wrong. See comment below: >It can be difficult to understand if something is sarcastic or satire when there is no tone of voice or facial cues to help. Especially when you don't exaggerate, and simply type out the same things as the group your satirizing. Maybe the only difference/give-away was the "crying" part of the polar bears. The rest is pretty much verbatim of some of the nastier comments I've seen in other threads. >Maybe the only difference/give-away was the "crying" part of the polar bears. The rest is pretty much verbatim of some of the nastier comments I've seen in other threads. > pretty much verbatim So yeah, your peers disagree with you. What I said is apparently "pretty much verbatim" of the stereotypical ilk, apparently. So which of the two of you are lying? Have that debate down in your counterpart's thread if you like. >There's nothing specifically stereotypical about what you wrote when it comes to people who dislike crypto The hilarious thing is I meant for my post to sound over the top and exaggerated vs the stereotypical meme. It was supposed to sound a bit ridiculous. Then I simultaneously get accused no one could possible understand it is satire because I didn't exaggerate enough while also being accused it's not satire because I exaggerated too much. The honest to god truth is I didn't realize people were actually saying shit quite this ridiculous until I was told this while being scolded in this thread, that people were saying such ridiculous things that my statement couldn't possibly be interpreted as satire because it was the verbatim argument of the people I was poking fun at. Maybe that hit too close to home for you, idk.

skinnymuch 4y ago
> while also being accused it's not satire because I exaggerated too much Who did this? I certainly didn't. I said the extremism of sounding like an unhinged loon* is what is coming out. Not satire of a stereotypical person against crypto. I also didn't think what you wrote was satire or exaggeration either. I read your comment as a seriously written one. Yet I don't think it's indicative of your narrative. -- Your entire logic appears to be literally one comment agreeing with your narrative. I’ll focus on one example. > The honest to god truth is I didn't realize people were actually saying shit quite this ridiculous until I was told this while being scolded in this thread, that people were saying such ridiculous things that my statement couldn't possibly be interpreted as satire because it was the verbatim argument of the people I was poking fun at. It isn't people. It is one person. The other two people just like i did, are taking your comment at face value. That doesn't mean they agree with your narrative . One person's hearsay shouldn't convince you. I actually brought up a specific anti crypto piece, Line Goes Up. Tons of discussions on it online. There aren't enough examples of your narrative in the real world about this for example (outside the consistent but small amount of unpleasant Karen sort of people) > Maybe that hit too close to home for you, idk. This is sad. If personally insulting me helps you, go for it! * why would you take offense to me calling your fake talking as unpleasant. The unpleasantness is your admitted satire. So it's not saying you're unpleasant, heh. That still doesn't stop you from talking about my unpleasantness.
- notch656a 4y ago
  Rather than replying in any meaningful way or really even reading what you wrote, I'm just going to sit back and relish the time wasted you'll never get back writing that, and not make the same mistake on my end. Adios.
  - skinnymuch 4y ago
    You didn’t “get me”. You got yourself. I write my comments for me. I have a log of my comments. It appears you write comments on here for others. It could be that’s what makes you speak in such bad faith? It sucks to live life for others. Even worse you don’t even like them.

skinnymuch 4y ago

> while also being accused it's not satire because I exaggerated too much Who did this? I certainly didn't. I said the extremism of sounding like an unhinged loon* is what is coming out. Not satire of a stereotypical person against crypto. I also didn't think what you wrote was satire or exaggeration either. I read your comment as a seriously written one. Yet I don't think it's indicative of your narrative. -- Your entire logic appears to be literally one comment agreeing with your narrative. I’ll focus on one example. > The honest to god truth is I didn't realize people were actually saying shit quite this ridiculous until I was told this while being scolded in this thread, that people were saying such ridiculous things that my statement couldn't possibly be interpreted as satire because it was the verbatim argument of the people I was poking fun at. It isn't people. It is one person. The other two people just like i did, are taking your comment at face value. That doesn't mean they agree with your narrative . One person's hearsay shouldn't convince you. I actually brought up a specific anti crypto piece, Line Goes Up. Tons of discussions on it online. There aren't enough examples of your narrative in the real world about this for example (outside the consistent but small amount of unpleasant Karen sort of people) > Maybe that hit too close to home for you, idk. This is sad. If personally insulting me helps you, go for it! * why would you take offense to me calling your fake talking as unpleasant. The unpleasantness is your admitted satire. So it's not saying you're unpleasant, heh. That still doesn't stop you from talking about my unpleasantness.

notch656a 4y ago
Rather than replying in any meaningful way or really even reading what you wrote, I'm just going to sit back and relish the time wasted you'll never get back writing that, and not make the same mistake on my end. Adios.
- skinnymuch 4y ago
  You didn’t “get me”. You got yourself. I write my comments for me. I have a log of my comments. It appears you write comments on here for others. It could be that’s what makes you speak in such bad faith? It sucks to live life for others. Even worse you don’t even like them.