39 ms·
i call BS on this. It's not python's fault and the change in performance due to language itself is minimal.
by upupandup 4y ago
i call BS on this. It's not python's fault and the change in performance due to language itself is minimal.
- potta_coffee 4y agoIt's no BS, go is much more performant. There are a lot of benchmarks out there. In the context of Lambda, it probably helps that I'm just shipping a compiled Go binary rather than a Python environment + dependencies. Regardless, there are Lambda workloads that are trivial with Go that are pretty much impossible with Python because of run time limits etc.