2 ms·

That's all great information for the case that people love their Teslas, I have no doubt about that. I'm still not convinced people are rebuying Tesla's because

That's all great information for the case that people love their Teslas, I have no doubt about that. I'm still not convinced people are rebuying Tesla's because they prefer touchscreens over tactile buttons though. I believe there are plenty of factors that go into that loyalty decision. I'm sure some people do prefer touchscreens, and some don't -- but we don't know what that breakdown is. This study just came out: https://www.vibilagare.se/nyheter/physical-buttons-outperform-touchscreens-new-cars-test-finds https://www.vibilagare.se/nyheter/physical-buttons-outperfor... The study adds another variable to the discussion -- even if users prefer touchscreens, touchscreens are less safe than real buttons.

ajross 4y ago
Sigh. That link is not a "study", and it's not measuring safety. It's a single test of task completion time run by a magazine supported by advertising from legacy car brands (mostly Volvo, it looks like). It's designed to do exactly what it just did, get itself into conversations like this so people who don't want to believe that their advertisers' competitor[1] has a good product can continue to believe that. FWIW: You don't need to go to Sweden to find that stuff anyway, Car & Driver and Motor Trend both hate Tesla too (and for the same reason: Tesla doesn't advertise). If there are safety effects measurable with Teslas, we'd be measuring safety effects. There are millions of these cars on the road. They are safe. I know it, you know it, the time for hand-wavy hypotheticals is long past. You need something more. Even Ralph Nader started with real accident statistics on the Corvair. [1] Tesla