It's a really weak article in general. 500 words about a single anecdote with no supporting data or much useful context at all, but which manages to name drop t

It's a really weak article in general. 500 words about a single anecdote with no supporting data or much useful context at all, but which manages to name drop two companies and their founders (one of which is presumably the sponsor of the article), along with some new features that they're working on. I have no doubt that racism like this is a significant problem in Singapore, but this kind of product-placement content doesn't do any justice to the issue.