4 ms·
This is awesome. Minor bug report - * 5 feet 8 inches to centimeters -> -171.72 cm * 5 feet 8 inches to meters -> -0.7272 m * 5 feet 8 inches to cms -> does
by vhanda 4y ago
This is awesome.
Minor bug report -
* 5 feet 8 inches to centimeters -> -171.72 cm
* 5 feet 8 inches to meters -> -0.7272 m
* 5 feet 8 inches to cms -> doesn't work
The conversion seems wrong in the case of cms, and I'm not sure why it's always negative.
- defrost 4y ago"to" is a subtraction operation, not a convert to cue. As in (distance from) 30 to 50 (is 20 == 50 - 30 )
- radiojasper 4y ago"cms" is nothing, try "cm". Also you're 100% correct that this shouldn't be a negative number. Screenie [0] [0] https://jasper.monster/sharex/firefox_eXIffwiyBq.png https://jasper.monster/sharex/firefox_eXIffwiyBq.png //EDIT Ah yeah, replace "to" with "in" and you're good! [1] [1] https://jasper.monster/sharex/firefox_rVKx2w1TUI.png https://jasper.monster/sharex/firefox_rVKx2w1TUI.png
- Spare_account 4y agoAfter reading the sibling comments to mine, I've worked out what it is doing. > * 5 feet 8 inches to centimeters -> -171.72 cm As @defrost said, the 'to' operator instructs NumPad to calculate the distance from the unit before 'to' and the unit after 'to'. To the nearest mm, 5 feet 8 inches = 172.72cm It appears that NumPad is defaulting to a value of '1' where no value is specified, so it is calcuating the distance BACK from '5 feet 8 inches' TO '1 centimeters'. It correctly responds with -171.72, which is 1cm less than 172.72. > * 5 feet 8 inches to meters -> -0.7272 m Same as above, except the calucation is the distance back from '5 feet 8 inches' TO '1 metres'.* If you use the operator 'in', NumPad calculates the answer correctly: 5 feet 8 inches in metres -> 1.7272 m