2 ms·
Right, but literal logos or obvious copyrighted characters aren't the same thing as a general style. I don't believe style is copyrightable. If there's a sourc
by TulliusCicero 4y ago
Right, but literal logos or obvious copyrighted characters aren't the same thing as a general style. I don't believe style is copyrightable.
If there's a source that says otherwise, I'd love to read about it.
- Springtime 4y agoWhat I was meaning is that the models have the potential to output wholesale sections of original trained data, not merely interpreting a style. Which ties into grandparent's point about how in music if a portion of music is sampled by another artist for a separate piece of music they are obligated to pay royalties for it. As I said though those things will likely be ironed out to avoid this more in time.
- wnkrshm 4y agoIt's not illegal, but if an artist does it, like deliberately copy another artist's style, as in more than a tribute but an attempt at carbon copy, that artist is almost shunned. So the nonlinear diffusion systems out there are told by prompt to make what in the art world is considered to be very rude.