> The point was that nuclear power plants are dangerous By this definition of "dangerous", other forms of power plants are much more dangerous. All other energ

> The point was that nuclear power plants are dangerous By this definition of "dangerous", other forms of power plants are much more dangerous. All other energy sources have killed or harmed many more people per unit of energy generated than nuclear has. > To model that unexpected, Chernobyl could be a good approximation. No, it isn't. That kind of comparison is like saying that, because bombs can explode, and explosives in bombs are chemically similar to gasoline, we shouldn't use gasoline in cars. It's simply not valid.