3 ms·
I totally agree about the cryptic-ness when it comes to useEffect and its usage, but the neat thing is that you can trivially write your own thin wrappers with
by phailhaus 4y ago
I totally agree about the cryptic-ness when it comes to useEffect and its usage, but the neat thing is that you can trivially write your own thin wrappers with better names! I think `useEffect` is the best name possible given how broad its use cases are, because it's literally for any function side effect.