I am in this camp. I want a "modern" nuclear design that isn't rooted in what the previous regime considered "safe". I want near 100% fuel consumption so there

I am in this camp. I want a "modern" nuclear design that isn't rooted in what the previous regime considered "safe". I want near 100% fuel consumption so there's no or far far less nuclear waste. LFTR allegedly does this (allegedly can use old solid fuel rod waste too) I want meltdown-proof design inherent to the reactor. LFTR has a self-moderating design and has a plug leading to a pool that separates the fluid fuel so it no longer is fissile. I want is scalable in size. And it has to be economical with solar/wind. LFTR probably has materials problems, but the chinese are giving one a go. We'll see. I don't think nuclear will cost competitive without a new round of approaches/designs. I don't think any current design will cut it, economically, safety in operation, safety in waste reduction/no transport, etc.