3 ms·
Though you can easily see a quick jump to a point where the creating and then the tweaking doesn't need a human involved.
by UberFly 4y ago
Though you can easily see a quick jump to a point where the creating and then the tweaking doesn't need a human involved.
- furyofantares 4y agoI can't easily see that, no. That's a very presumptive way to word your speculation. I don't have much of a prediction except that it seems a long long ways from there not being value a human can by working on prompts and cleaning up images. For sure there's already applications where you don't need a human involved per image. But for applications where it makes sense to spend 5, 10, 60 minutes of a human's time to improve the output, I think the baseline output could improve drastically and as long as humans can still make improvements within a timeframe that makes sense for the application, it will still make sense to do so.