2 ms·
>Palmer's friend netted approximately $35,000 and $73,000 in profits Yeah I'd like to see proof that's actually all there is, rather than all they were able to
by notch656a 4y ago
>Palmer's friend netted approximately $35,000 and $73,000 in profits
Yeah I'd like to see proof that's actually all there is, rather than all they were able to charge them with. It's not as if those involved in financial related crimes are always honest about finances, and it could be they only gave up the portions where they figured out the feds were going to find.
- halfmatthalfcat 4y agoOne could assume that the SEC (or any legal entity with investigative powers) will do their own due diligence and in this case, will do their own forensic accounting investigation into these two to corroborate their story.
- gruez 4y ago>Yeah I'd like to see proof that's actually all there is, rather than all they were able to charge them with. doesn't this require proving a negative? If they got charged, presumably the feds combed through their bank records and found any unexplained deposits. You could argue that they had the real loot in some numbered offshore account and/or crypto that's totally unlinked to them, but I'm not sure how you'd prove that those accounts don't exist.