3 ms·
Classic luddite argument at the core of the article. Technology both displaces jobs and enhances jobs. It's impossible to tell a priori the economic effect. I
by VHRanger 4y ago
Classic luddite argument at the core of the article.
Technology both displaces jobs and enhances jobs. It's impossible to tell a priori the economic effect.
It's just as possible that artists leveraging these tools are paid more because they're incredibly more productive than the overall demand for art somehow being sated and reducing artist employment
- emporas 4y agoVery true. This technology will become dirt cheap in a matter of 2-3 years. Arguably a lot cheaper than brushes and paint were at the time of Leonardo Da Vinci. AI art, paints something beautiful which is computed using other paintings and real life objects. What an artist has in his head, the original idea, cannot be computed by the machine, by definition. The processes of the human mind, cannot be computed just like that.
- TulliusCicero 4y agoMissing the point of the article if you think it's similar to luddism. The industrial revolution had a huge impact on society, discussing that and how it will displace or transform some occupations isn't the same thing as actually fighting back against the new technology.