I find it hypocritical that the author writes this: "...If we remove all the pretense, it usually comes down to people defending their personal choices. We have

I find it hypocritical that the author writes this: "...If we remove all the pretense, it usually comes down to people defending their personal choices. We have a tendency to try to justify and protect our investment in whatever languages and tools we know and use. This makes sense. But it isn’t always rational behavior." Yet his entire article is a justification for his defence of his code preferences. Moreover his article is vague and has no technical depth, despite his controversial statements/advocacy. E.g. not a single line in the article refers to virtual environments of any kind, which is basic to how Python works and dependency management as part of the (arguably Pythonic) tooling process.