Not me. I am building http://datalisp.is http://datalisp.is. I am also a douglas adams fan but younger than you by more than a decade so I think we can trust t

Not me. I am building http://datalisp.is http://datalisp.is. I am also a douglas adams fan but younger than you by more than a decade so I think we can trust this perception we share. My objection to the current state of things is absolute. So I'm in the "die trying" phase of "changing the world" - it is going excellently - I don't have a single cent and cannot go to the doctor or control my diet. The thing is, people don't do anything unless rewarded by the assessment system (at what age do kids start asking "if it will be on the exam" - because a few years later they're lost). If people assess the situation honestly then they see that the assessment system is lost in delusion but, in my experience, that makes people doubt their own assessments rather than the system. It is one big tragedy of the commons w.r.t. bureaucracy. The solution is to throw away all notions of safety, nothing can be a safe store of value, no one can have oversight over the bureaucracy... we'll just have probabilistic assessments of our worth w.r.t. various contexts and we'll be able to use this data to persuade others to do business with us (so they can increase the likelihood that they can persuade others in tgeir contexts). This way we have a chance, with our current system it is trivial to prove that we don't (tragedy wrt bureaucracy).