3 ms·
It might be! I'm not a lawyer, and have no idea if there is already precedent in the US specifically regarding castes, but there is a motion that national orig
by saalweachter 4y ago
It might be!
I'm not a lawyer, and have no idea if there is already precedent in the US specifically regarding castes, but there is a motion that national origin covers ancestry.
It's entirely possible that the legal department in the story above thought it was a cut and dry case and that's why they pushed hard to shut it down before it became one.
- ummonk 4y agoYeah it sounds like legal saw it as cut and dry at least that he could be fired (and possibly that they also had a requirement to do so), while HR folks were making nonsensical arguments of the kind we're seeing here from non-lawyers.