4 ms·
I mean, certainly gather information and follow due process, but once it's clear what occurred, there is no question that a person who refuses to work with cowo
by civilized 4y ago
I mean, certainly gather information and follow due process, but once it's clear what occurred, there is no question that a person who refuses to work with coworkers based on lower caste does not belong in any workplace with lower caste workers.
And anyone who resists that principle is a co-conspirator in caste-based oppression and should leave as well.
- azinman2 4y agoWhy can’t they work together, but force to not discriminate?
- civilized 4y agoWorking relationships are complex and require a lot of trust. You can't just wave a magic wand over two people and say "discrimination be gone". The bigot can and will always find ways to harm the victim without accountability.
- azinman2 4y agoBut we already do this for all other protected classes.
- civilized 4y agoI don't even know what this means, let alone if it is true or not. How do you "force not to discriminate"? How is this currently enforced in companies?
- azinman2 4y agoWell if you discriminate say based on race or gender, you’re fired. As people know they therefore can’t do this, they need to keep their feelings to themselves and deal with it. The GP said: > there is no question that a person who refuses to work with coworkers based on lower caste does not belong in any workplace with lower caste workers Which I read as separate castes if they will discriminate. That’s like saying separate race or gender if someone will discriminate. That’s currently not how it works for other protected classes.
- civilized 4y agoOk, to clarify, I did not mean to say that bigots should continue to be employed separately. I meant they should be fired.