3 ms·
RemoveBG is very good at what it does, and it certainly would be nice if there was an offline version. However, there isn't, and I don't think you'll find an of
by Retr0id 4y ago
RemoveBG is very good at what it does, and it certainly would be nice if there was an offline version. However, there isn't, and I don't think you'll find an offline tool that comes close in terms of quality of result.
There are cases were privacy of data isn't a real concern - e.g. you're about to publish the resulting file anyway. If you need to keep your data private, then sure, don't pipe it through an online tool. But that doesn't mean the usescases aren't there.
- bertman 4y ago>However, there isn't, and I don't think you'll find an offline tool that comes close in terms of quality of result. There is: https://github.com/danielgatis/rembg https://github.com/danielgatis/rembg
- Retr0id 4y agoThis is great, but again does not come close in terms of quality of result. Take the lion example from the readme: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/danielgatis/rembg/master/examples/animal-3.out.png https://raw.githubusercontent.com/danielgatis/rembg/master/e... The alpha blending of the fur around the edges is way off. Compare to RemoveBG results: https://i.imgur.com/Jt2ICsD.png https://i.imgur.com/Jt2ICsD.png Unfortunately it won't let me export in full-res without creating an acount, but the fur is handled properly.