3 ms·
Approximately 100 gems, representing about a third of downloads. The original plan was to target based on download rankings, but these fluctuate, so in theory
by jacques_chester 4y ago
Approximately 100 gems, representing about a third of downloads.
The original plan was to target based on download rankings, but these fluctuate, so in theory gems could be added and then removed from the list. A count of downloads can only go up.
- nkantar 4y agoWere download rankings combined with one-way "membership" considered? (One-way "membership": once a gem/user qualifies based on recent downloads, they're permanently required in perpetuity.) This seems to be like it would mitigate the on/off problem of using a variable metric while also being biased to the currently relevant gems/users.
- jacques_chester 4y agoIIRC we figured it would be more confusing than helpful.
- nkantar 4y agoThat makes a lot of sense, actually.