3 ms·
> Where is their concern for other violence that is more prevalent? Isn't this just straightforward whataboutism? If every person that is advocating against a
by DubiousPusher 4y ago
> Where is their concern for other violence that is more prevalent?
Isn't this just straightforward whataboutism? If every person that is advocating against a problem in society has to advocate against every problem in society they will never get anything accomplished because there is always another injustice.
- malfist 4y agoNot only is it just straightforward whataboutism, it's also implying, we as a society, can only work on one problem at a time. If we're tackling caste discrimination, we can't also be working to reduce violence. This is an either/or logical fallacy.