3 ms·
Yes, this is the crux of the matter. Forget the ad-hominem "he's a known crank" arguments. He raises valid questions in his article, if he's a crank, then ref
by RachelF 4y ago
Yes, this is the crux of the matter.
Forget the ad-hominem "he's a known crank" arguments.
He raises valid questions in his article, if he's a crank, then refute his facts or conclusions.
- Ekaros 4y agoI'm all for scientific community entertaining the valid questions of even the cranks. Specially when it should pretty quick answer or actually an interesting one that might be worth to spend bit of time on. Not entirety of their production is bad. And they can offer some different perspectives.