3 ms·
This doesn't make sense at all to me. They're comparing income in constant 2022 dollars with the CPI. That's saying "if we adjusted historical salaries for inf
by NovemberWhiskey 4y ago
This doesn't make sense at all to me.
They're comparing income in constant 2022 dollars with the CPI. That's saying "if we adjusted historical salaries for inflation, then assumed that the constant 2022 dollar numbers were actually nominal numbers for each point in history, then people would've been able to buy much more stuff back then". Which is true, but not very meaningful.
The whole point of the constant 2022 dollar adjustment is to back out the effect of inflation. If 2020 average salaries in 2022 dollars were $44.2K, and 1970 average salaries in 2022 dollars were $24.6K then 2020 workers have 80% higher purchasing power for whatever basket is used for the deflator.
- readams 4y agoThey've specifically pulled out only the categories that have risen faster than inflation, and didn't include any categories that have fallen relative to inflation. So it's guaranteed to get this result.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- Skunkleton 4y agoMaybe they are arguing that GenZ should commute to the past? That way they can spend their 2022 dollars on good value 1970s products?