4 ms·
> we love seeing repeat-founders build on past successes by growing from lessons learned," Andreessen wrote. Neumann's success was really developing a hype mach
by quantified 4y ago
> we love seeing repeat-founders build on past successes by growing from lessons learned," Andreessen wrote.
Neumann's success was really developing a hype machine and getting money from investors into his pockets.
Color me extremely dubious that this will end up being a good deal for the renters, unless they're the very high end ones. To generate VC-worthy returns, there needs to be a significant cash extraction from the renters. VCs will care about value when the company goes public or gets acquired, the valuation could total fluff to that point but there needs to be a better profit for this venture over traditional real estate or it's not particularly attractive. The delta between reality-distortion valuation and real-reality valuation is what got Adam his platinum parachute the first time around.
I suspect the innovations are about monitoring the denizens and monetizing the data.
But, open mind, there may be innovations around how apartment buildings get tied to infrastructure, to the other resources of the city, to maintenance, energy, disposal services that provide efficiency without acting like a landlord.
- mandeepj 4y ago> we love seeing repeat-founders build on past successes by growing from lessons learned I guess Andreessen definition of success is different than how rest of the world saw unfolding of WeWork into a collapse.
- smabie 4y agoI mean WeWork still exists and is still a unicorn so I don't think it's fair to call it a "collapse." Certainly Adam is good at something as he pretty much willed WeWork into existence from nothing.
- papito 4y agoWeWork is not a unicorn. It's just an office space real estate company. It always has been. It's a profitable space, for sure, but there is going to be no "40x" nonsense.